A Pivotal Choice: Trump vs. Harris on Climate Change

The article contrasts Trump’s and Harris’s positions on climate change, framing the upcoming election as pivotal for environmental policy. The reasoning is generally factual, but biased language colors Trump's position with terms like "scam" and "kamikazee," implicitly diminishing his stance. The appeal to authority arises through extensive reliance on scientists and experts to bolster the urgency of addressing climate change, which may exclude counterarguments. Additionally, Trump's climate position is somewhat simplified to a “hoax” narrative, a mild straw man that omits any nuanced rationale for his views on fossil fuel reliance. Overall, the argument is informative but subtly slanted.