After two presidential losses, women wonder what it will take to shatter the glass ceiling

This article focuses on Kamala Harris’s election loss, portraying it as a reflection of broader societal resistance to female leadership. It uses an Appeal to Emotion, emphasizing feelings of disappointment and pride among Harris’s supporters, which could lead readers to interpret her defeat as a symbolic setback for women. The False Cause fallacy appears in the implication that her loss was largely due to gender bias, with limited evidence for such a direct causal link. Ambiguities around terms like “electability bias” and “unique perspective” also contribute to a diffuse argument. These elements, combined, create an impressionistic rather than analytical narrative on her loss.