top of page

Are Edibles Safer Than Smoking?

Cannabis-infused chocolate fountains are flowing at weddings.

Dani Blum

New York Times

January 29, 2024

Viewpoint Detected:


Fallacies Detected:

Anecdotal Fallacy, Appeal to Nature, Hasty Generalization

credAIble Evaluation:

The article provides an overview of the complexities involved in comparing the health effects of consuming cannabis through edibles versus smoking. It does so by presenting perspectives from various researchers and clinicians, along with data from studies, to illuminate the nuanced nature of cannabis consumption's health implications. The narrative maintains a neutral stance, acknowledging the potential risks and benefits of both methods without overtly favoring one over the other. It highlights the immediate effects of smoking cannabis versus the delayed, sometimes more intense effects of edibles, and notes the potential for overconsumption and the resultant adverse outcomes with edibles. The discussion includes the potential lung damage from smoking cannabis, contrasting it with the absence of smoke-related toxins in edibles but pointing out the possible intense psychoactive experiences that can lead to emergency room visits. The article also touches on the broader health implications of cannabis use, including its impact on cognition and cardiovascular health. While it aims to provide a balanced view, it leans on anecdotal evidence and generalizations in places, such as the assertion that edibles may lead to more intense highs and potentially more emergency room visits, without comprehensive data to fully support these claims. It also implies a naturalistic fallacy by suggesting edibles might be a healthier alternative due to the absence of smoke, without thoroughly examining other health risks edibles may carry.

bottom of page