Congress must stop terrorists who keep coming in through Biden's broken border

The article demonstrates a strong right-leaning bias in its criticism of President Biden's border policies and its portrayal of the consequences of these policies. It employs straw man arguments by oversimplifying and misrepresenting the Biden administration's policies and intentions for criticism. The use of ad hominem attacks is evident in the negative characterization of the Biden administration and its approach to border security. Biased language is prevalent throughout the article, with a clear negative stance towards the administration's policies and actions. The article makes hasty generalizations about the nature and intentions of individuals attempting to cross the border, painting them in a uniformly negative light. A slippery slope argument is used by suggesting that the current border policies will inevitably lead to increasingly severe national security threats. It also presents a false dilemma by implying that the only alternatives are either total reform of the current policies or continued national security risks, without acknowledging the complexities of immigration policy and border security. The narrative lacks balance, focusing heavily on criticizing the Biden administration and its policies without adequately considering alternative viewpoints or the challenges involved in managing border security and immigration.