D.C.'s crime numbers are all the buzz. But how do we interpret them accurately?

This article offers a nuanced and balanced examination of crime trends in Washington, D.C., featuring expert analysis and context to clarify competing political narratives. It avoids emotionally charged language, absolutist claims, or rhetorical misdirection. Experts like Thomas Abt and Adam Gelb highlight the complexity of interpreting crime statistics and caution against simplistic comparisons or misleading framing. The report successfully separates perception from reality and acknowledges data limitations without speculating irresponsibly. No significant logical fallacies are present; the reasoning is careful, proportionate, and evidence-based throughout.