Hamas treatment of hostages 'intolerable,' Trump envoy says

The article presents statements from U.S. officials and former President Trump regarding Hamas and the hostage situation in Gaza. It employs biased language (e.g., "not a single Hamas member will be safe"), which frames the argument in a one-sided manner. Appeal to emotion is used to provoke outrage over Hamas’ actions (e.g., "Who keeps dead bodies? Who does that?"). There is also ambiguity in phrases like "it is OVER for you" and "there will be hell to pay later," which lack clear definitions of consequences. While the article highlights a serious issue, its rhetoric leans toward emotionally charged persuasion over logical reasoning.