How the border could cost Biden the election

The article displays a moderate right-leaning bias, evident in its critical perspective on Biden's immigration policies and somewhat sympathetic portrayal of Trump's measures. A Hasty Generalization fallacy is observed in broad statements about the impacts of Biden's policies on immigration without considering all complexities. Biased Language is present, subtly favoring conservative viewpoints while critiquing liberal policies. The False Dilemma fallacy emerges in presenting only extreme outcomes of immigration policies, neglecting potential middle-ground solutions. A Slippery Slope argument is implied, suggesting that failure to address border issues could lead to Trump's re-election and subsequent drastic actions, without considering alternative scenarios or solutions. The article's focus on the negative consequences of current immigration policies, coupled with a lack of a balanced discussion on the successes or potential positive aspects, underscores its moderate right bias and the use of logical fallacies.