top of page

Immigrants Killed in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Died Doing Job 'Others Do Not Want to Do'

They came to the United States for a chance at a better life.


US News

March 28, 2024

Viewpoint Detected:


Fallacies Detected:

Biased Language, Appeal to Emotion, Personal Incredulity

credAIble Evaluation:

The article on the tragic collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge and its impact on the immigrant community demonstrates a strong presence of logical fallacies, specifically Biased Language, Appeal to Emotion, and Personal Incredulity, which collectively shape the reader's perception of the event and its broader implications. Biased Language is evident in the depiction of the Hispanic community's work ethic and the types of jobs they are willing to take, portraying them in a heroic light while subtly critiquing the broader society's reliance on immigrant labor for "work that others do not want to do." This language choice frames the narrative in a way that may lead readers to form biased opinions about both the immigrant community and the societal dynamics at play. The Appeal to Emotion is a significant driving force in this article, especially through the personal stories of the bridge collapse victims and the response from the Baltimore Hispanic community. The vivid description of community vigils, fundraising efforts, and individual testimonies is designed to evoke sympathy and outrage, which, while important for understanding the human aspect of the tragedy, may overshadow a more nuanced discussion of the systemic issues involved. Personal Incredulity is introduced through the perspectives of community members and leaders who express disbelief and frustration at the societal undervaluation of Hispanic workers, juxtaposed with the dangerous conditions they often work under. This fallacy is used to challenge the reader's acceptance of the status quo, suggesting that the situation is so obviously unjust that anyone who considers it would naturally demand change. However, it simplifies complex socio-economic dynamics into a matter of moral clarity, potentially limiting a deeper understanding of the causes and solutions. Overall, the article employs these logical fallacies to craft a narrative that, while compelling and emotionally resonant, may lead readers towards predetermined conclusions about the tragedy, its causes, and its significance within the broader context of immigration and labor in the United States.

bottom of page