No dictators': Top Democrat signals effort to restrain Trump if he wins White House

The argument attempts to counter perceived abuses of presidential power, focusing heavily on former President Trump without naming him explicitly. It uses the Straw Man fallacy by exaggerating the likelihood of Trump acting as a dictator. The Appeal to Emotion is evident in the use of loaded language like “tyrants” and “dictators.” A False Dilemma is presented, implying only two outcomes: unchecked presidential power or the proposed legislative actions. An indirect Ad Hominem targets Trump, suggesting a singular threat to democracy.