One Weird Constitutional Trick Won't Save Democracy: The 14th Amendment is not the solution to Trumpism

The article strongly emphasizes a left-leaning perspective, particularly in its critical portrayal of right-wing politics and the framing of the Bush v. Gore incident and Donald Trump's actions. It employs an Appeal to Emotion by using charged language to invoke a sense of urgency and danger. Hasty Generalizations are evident in broad statements about the Republican Party and Trump's supporters. The False Dilemma fallacy arises from presenting only two extreme outcomes, ignoring possible middle-ground solutions. Biased Language is used throughout to negatively characterize the opposing view. A Slippery Slope argument is implied, suggesting that not taking extreme measures against Trump will lead to dire consequences. The Straw Man fallacy appears in the misrepresentation of opponents' arguments for the purpose of easily countering them. Lastly, an Appeal to Authority is noted in the heavy reliance on experts' opinions to bolster the argument without sufficient critical analysis of their views. The piece's focus on uncovering and criticizing every perceived flaw in the opposition's stance, while neglecting a balanced view, highlights its strong left bias and use of multiple logical fallacies.