top of page

Takeaways from special counsel's report into Biden's handling of classified documents

Special counsel Robert Hur’s report released Thursday did not charge President Joe Biden with a crime, but it painted a picture of a forgetful commander in chief.

Jeremy Herb, Hannah Rabinowitz, Devan Cole, Zachary Cohen, Holmes Lybrand


February 8, 2024

Viewpoint Detected:


Fallacies Detected:

Biased Language, Appeal to Emotion, Ad Hominem, False Dilemma, Personal Incredulity

credAIble Evaluation:

The article provides a detailed account of Special Counsel Robert Hur's report on President Joe Biden's handling of classified documents, highlighting aspects of Biden's memory and decision-making processes. It employs a strong intensity of logical fallacies to construct a narrative that might influence readers' perceptions of Biden's competence. Biased Language is evident in the portrayal of Biden's memory issues, potentially leading to a skewed understanding of the situation. An Appeal to Emotion is used effectively to elicit sympathy or concern over Biden's described forgetfulness and emotional responses to accusations. Ad Hominem attacks are subtly incorporated, focusing criticism on Biden's personal attributes, such as age and memory, rather than strictly on his actions or policies. The text presents a False Dilemma by implying the only reasons for not charging Biden are his cooperation with the investigation or his portrayal as a sympathetic figure due to his age and memory, overlooking the legal nuances of intent and willfulness in mishandling classified documents. Personal Incredulity is showcased through skepticism towards Biden's explanations and justifications for his actions, suggesting that they are not plausible or believable. The narrative, while addressing important legal and ethical considerations, leans towards a biased presentation that could influence public opinion on Biden's fitness for office and the impartiality of the investigation.

bottom of page