top of page

The Challenges of an Aging President

Because of his age and his determination to run for a second term, President Biden is taking the American public into uncharted waters.

Editorial Board

New York Times

February 9, 2024

Viewpoint Detected:


Fallacies Detected:

Appeal to Emotion, Ad Hominem, False Dilemma, Biased Language, Appeal to Tradition

credAIble Evaluation:

The text critiques President Biden's capacity for a second term, focusing heavily on his age and public interaction, juxtaposed against the backdrop of political opposition and public perception. It employs a moderate intensity of logical fallacies, notably appealing to emotion by invoking fear and concern about Biden's age and cognitive abilities. Ad Hominem attacks are present, subtly undermining Biden's competence based solely on his age, rather than his performance or policies. The argument presents a false dilemma by suggesting the only alternatives are Biden's perceived inadequacy or facing the "unique danger" of Trump, ignoring other possible candidates or outcomes. Biased language is used to sway the reader against Biden, describing his actions and responses in a negative light without objective analysis. Lastly, it appeals to tradition by unfavorably comparing Biden's public engagement to past presidents, suggesting a deviation from tradition inherently signals inadequacy. The narrative fails to provide a balanced assessment, leaning heavily on emotional manipulation and biased comparisons to question Biden's fitness for office.

bottom of page