The Founders didn’t want a Mar-a-Lago executive branch

The article takes a moderate left stance, critiquing former President Donald Trump's vision for American democracy, comparing it unfavorably to the style of Mar-a-Lago, implying grandeur and imperial tendencies. It employs a false dilemma by presenting Trump's approach as the only alternative to the current system, ignoring other potential reforms. The piece frequently appeals to authority, referencing historical figures and experts to bolster its arguments. Biased language is evident in the negative portrayal of Trump's proposals and the favorable view of legislative power. A slippery slope argument is suggested, implying that Trump's plan could lead to autocracy. Additionally, false analogies are used to compare complex political structures with simpler systems like sports refereeing, oversimplifying the issues. The narrative emphasizes the importance of legislative power and critiques the erosion of this power in favor of executive authority, advocating for a return to a more balanced distribution of powers between branches of government.