The growing threat behind Biden's Supreme Court proposal

The author argues against proposed reforms to the Supreme Court, employing several significant logical fallacies. Emotional language and alarmist scenarios are used to sway the reader, exemplifying Appeal to Emotion. The Straw Man fallacy is present in the mischaracterization of the left's intentions. The text presents a False Dilemma by implying only negative outcomes from the reforms. Slippery Slope arguments predict extreme consequences without evidence. Red Herrings distract from the main issue with unrelated points. The author's assertions about the reforms' intentions and outcomes often rely on Begging the Question.