top of page

The TikTok ban is a bad idea

Gen Zers might be about to have more free time on their hands.

The Editorial Board

Washington Post

March 12, 2024

Viewpoint Detected:


Fallacies Detected:

Appeal to Emotion, Slippery Slope, False Dilemma, Biased Language

credAIble Evaluation:

This article critically examines the legislative efforts to ban TikTok in the United States due to its Chinese ownership, presenting a nuanced discussion on the balance between national security concerns and free expression. The piece employs an Appeal to Emotion by vividly describing the potential loss of a "vibrant outlet for speech" for millions of Americans, invoking concern over restricting public discourse. The narrative also suggests a Slippery Slope, warning that the ban could lead to further arbitrary actions against other foreign-owned apps without proper adjudication, escalating control over Americans' digital lives. The presentation of the situation as a False Dilemma—either ban TikTok under its current ownership or risk national security—ignores potential intermediate solutions, like effective oversight or operational changes within TikTok to mitigate risks. Additionally, Biased Language is used to characterize the legislative action as "arbitrarily overriding" and the bill's potential consequences as "exile" for TikTok, framing the legislative process in a negative light. This analysis underscores the complex interplay between safeguarding digital privacy and security and preserving open channels for expression and innovation, advocating for a measured and transparent approach to addressing concerns associated with foreign-owned digital platforms.

bottom of page