Undecided voters tell NYT they needed more from Kamala Harris in the debate: 'She still has to impress me'

The text highlights mixed voter reactions to a debate between Harris and Trump, relying heavily on individual opinions to suggest broader voter sentiment, which constitutes an Anecdotal Fallacy. It also implies a causation between voter dissatisfaction and candidates' debate performances without substantial evidence, leading to a False Cause fallacy. Additionally, the language used in some voter quotes and descriptions subtly favors Trump, indicating Biased Language. While these fallacies are present, they do not severely undermine the text’s overall argument.